Northwest Food Processors Ass'n v. Reilly

Ninth Circuit

Northwest Food Processors Ass'n v. Reilly

869 F.2d 542

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 1989

DocketNos. 88-4339, 88-4389 and 88-7216

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 869 F.2d 542 (Northwest Food Processors Ass'n v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northwest Food Processors Ass'n v. Reilly, 869 F.2d 542 (9th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This court has jurisdiction in this case to review the final order of the Administrator of the Environmental Agency filed June 10, 1988 canceling registrations of products containing dinoseb and permitting the use of existing stocks. 7 U.S.C. § 136n(b).

The petition for review is granted. The final order of the EPA Administrator filed June 10, 1988 canceling registrations of products containing dinoseb and permitting the use of existing stocks, subject to the restrictions and conditions of such order, is AFFIRMED in its entirety.

The motion of defendants-intervenors-cross-appellants for an injunction pending appeal is DENIED.

This order is filed at this time because of the particular need to decide this case promptly. A formal opinion will be prepared and filed at a later date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This court has jurisdiction in this case to review the final order of the Administrator of the Environmental Agency filed June 10, 1988 canceling registrations of products containing dinoseb and permitting the use of existing stocks. 7 U.S.C. § 136n(b).

The petition for review is granted. The final order of the EPA Administrator filed June 10, 1988 canceling registrations of products containing dinoseb and permitting the use of existing stocks, subject to the restrictions and conditions of such order, is AFFIRMED in its entirety.

The motion of defendants-intervenors-cross-appellants for an injunction pending appeal is DENIED.

This order is filed at this time because of the particular need to decide this case promptly. A formal opinion will be prepared and filed at a later date.

Northwest Food Processors Association, a Nonprofit Association Tualatin Valley Fruit Marketing, Inc., an Oregon Corporation American Frozen Food Institute, a Non-Profit Association James M. Love, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, and Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General for the State of Oregon, on Behalf of the People of the State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. William K. Reilly , Administrator, David Alvarez Alicia Prieto Cristina Esquivel National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides Northwest Coalition Against Pesticides Natural Resources Defense Council United Farmworkers Union of Washington State Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. American Frozen Food Institute, a Nonprofit Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency William K. Reilly , Administrator

869 F.2d 542 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 F.2d 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwest-food-processors-assn-v-reilly-ca9-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack