FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ENVIRONMENTAL PESTICIDE CONTROL

Administrative procedure; judicial review

7 U.S.C. § 136n
Title7Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ENVIRONMENTAL PESTICIDE CONTROL

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 136n (Administrative procedure; judicial review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 136n.

Text

(a)District court review Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, the refusal of the Administrator to cancel or suspend a registration or to change a classification not following a hearing and other final actions of the Administrator not committed to the discretion of the Administrator by law are judicially reviewable by the district courts of the United States.
(b)Review by court of appeals In the case of actual controversy as to the validity of any order issued by the Administrator following a public hearing, any person who will be adversely affected by such order and who had been a party to the proceedings may obtain judicial review by filing in the United States court of appeals for the circuit wherein such person resides or has a place of business, within 60 days after the e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
801 F.2d 430 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
199 case citations
Burke v. Dow Chemical Co.
797 F. Supp. 1128 (E.D. New York, 1992)
34 case citations
Higgins v. Monsanto Co.
862 F. Supp. 751 (N.D. New York, 1994)
29 case citations
Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.
705 A.2d 841 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
29 case citations
Reckitt Benckiser Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
613 F.3d 1131 (D.C. Circuit, 2010)
24 case citations
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
847 F.3d 1075 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
23 case citations
National Family Farm Coalition v. Usepa
960 F.3d 1120 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
20 case citations
Defenders of Wildlife v. Jackson
791 F. Supp. 2d 96 (District of Columbia, 2011)
18 case citations
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Costle
631 F.2d 922 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
17 case citations
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
615 F. Supp. 811 (S.D. Indiana, 1985)
12 case citations
Monsanto Co. v. Acting Adm'r, United States EPA
564 F. Supp. 552 (E.D. Missouri, 1983)
8 case citations
Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection Agency
65 F. Supp. 3d 742 (N.D. California, 2014)
6 case citations
MOBAY CHEMICAL CORP., CHEMAGRO AGR. DIV. v. Train
394 F. Supp. 1342 (W.D. Missouri, 1975)
5 case citations
Northwest Food Processors Ass'n v. Reilly
886 F.2d 1075 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
5 case citations
Hardin v. BASF Corp.
290 F. Supp. 2d 964 (E.D. Arkansas, 2003)
4 case citations
Merrell v. Thomas
608 F. Supp. 644 (D. Oregon, 1985)
4 case citations
Amvac Chemical Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
653 F.2d 1260 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
3 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §16, as added Pub. L. 92–516, §2, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 994; amended Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(4)(C), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3357; Pub. L. 100–532, title VIII, §801(i), Oct. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 2682; Pub. L. 102–237, title X, §1006(b)(1), (2), (3)(P), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1895, 1896.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1991—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–237, §1006(b)(1), (2), (3)(P), substituted "the Administrator" for "he" before "based", "the Administrator's" for "his", and "the Administrator" for "him" after "designated by".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 102–237, §1006(b)(1), substituted "the Administrator" for "he" before "may".
1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–532 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "Except as is otherwise provided in this subchapter, Agency refusals to cancel or suspend registrations or change classifications not following a hearing and other final Agency actions not committed to Agency discretion by law are judicially reviewable in the district courts."
1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provisions requiring the court to advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of all cases filed pursuant to this section.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–532 effective on expiration of 60 days after Oct. 25, 1988, see section 901 of Pub. L. 100–532, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Effective Date
For effective date of section, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–516, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 136n, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/136n.