Northwest Administrators Inc v. CY Expo LLC

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedOctober 14, 2020
Docket2:20-cv-00056
StatusUnknown

This text of Northwest Administrators Inc v. CY Expo LLC (Northwest Administrators Inc v. CY Expo LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northwest Administrators Inc v. CY Expo LLC, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Opinion

1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS 11 INC., CASE NO. C20-00056-RAJ 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 CY EXPO LLC, a Nevada limited 15 liability company, 16 Defendant. 17

18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. 20 Dkt. # 8. Having reviewed the record, the Court GRANTS the motion and directs the 21 clerk to enter default judgment as directed at the conclusion of this order. 22 II. BACKGROUND 23 On January 13, 2020, Plaintiff Northwest Administrators, Inc., the authorized 24 administrative agent for and assignee of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension 25 Trust Fund (“Trust”), filed this action to collect contributions, liquidated damages, 26 interest, and all attorney’s fees and costs related to Defendant CY Expo LLC 27 1 (“Defendant”), who has allegedly failed to pay monthly pension contributions from 2 October 2019 through November 2019. Dkt # 1 at 3-4. Defendant’s Office Manager, 3 Julie Daily, was properly served on January 22, 2020. Dkt. # 5. Defendant failed to file 4 a response to the complaint. On March 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for default 5 against Defendant. Dkt. # 6. On March 12, 2020, a Clerk’s Order of Default was issued. 6 Dkt. # 7. 7 Plaintiff has since filed a motion for default judgment. Dkt. # 8. Plaintiff 8 indicated that Defendant had submitted the past due payments: payment for October 2019 9 in the amount of $12,769.84 (due November 10, 2019) had been received on February 3, 10 2020; payment for November 2019 in the amount of $10,178.14 (due on December 10, 11 2019) had been received on January 24, 2020; and payment for December 2019 in the 12 amount of $3,505.12 (due January 10, 2020) had also been received on January 24, 2020. 13 Dkt. # 9 at 4-5. Defendant again failed to respond. 14 III. LEGAL STANDARD 15 At the default judgment stage, a court presumes all well-pleaded factual allegations 16 are true, except those related to damages. TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 17 917-18 (9th Cir. 1987); see also Fair House. of Marin v. Combs, 285 F.3d 899, 906 (9th 18 Cir. 2002). The entry of default judgment under Rule 55(b) is “an extreme measure,” and 19 disfavored cases should be decided on their merits whenever reasonably possible. Cmty. 20 Dental Servs. v. Tani, 282 F.3d 1164, 1170 (9th Cir. 2002); also see Westchester Fire Ins. 21 Co. v. Mendez, 585 F.3d 1183, 1189 (9th Cir. 2009). 22 In addition, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1) permits a court to enter 23 default judgment when a plaintiff’s claim “is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made 24 certain by computation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1). In moving a court for default 25 judgment, a plaintiff must submit evidence supporting the claims for a particular sum of 26 damages. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)(B). In determining damages, a court can rely on 27 declarations submitted by a plaintiff. Dr. JKL Ltd. v. HPC IT Educ. Ctr., 749 F. Supp. 2d 1 1046 (N.D. Cal. 2010). Where there is evidence establishing a defendant’s liability, a 2 court has discretion, not an obligation, to enter a default judgment. Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 3 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980); see also Alan Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Albright, 862 4 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir. 1988). 5 IV. DISCUSSION 6 Plaintiff’s evidence establishes that Defendant was delinquent in its monthly 7 contributions to the Trust from October 2019 through December 2019. Dkt. # 9; Dkt. 8 # 9-1 at 20. Pursuant to the terms of the parties’ Agreement and Declaration of Trust, 9 Defendant is required to pay liquidated damages equal to 20 percent of delinquently paid 10 contributions, interest on the amount due, as well as attorney’s fees and costs. Dkt. # 9-1 11 at 10. Plaintiff has shown the interest rate at the time the contributions were due was five 12 percent per annum. Dkt. # 8-1 at 4. 13 Accordingly, Plaintiff has shown that it is entitled to liquidated damages in the 14 amount of $5,290.62, of which $2,122.97 was paid, leaving a balance due of $3,167.65. 15 Dkt. # 9-1 at 20. Plaintiff is entitled to interest in the amount of $218.15 for the months 16 of October 2019 through December 2019. Id. Plaintiff has also presented evidence of 17 attorney’s fees and costs. Dkt # 8-1 at 6. In accordance with Trustees of the Const. 18 Indus. & Laborers Health & Welfare Trust v. Redland Ins. Co., 460 F.3d 1253, 1256-57 19 (9th Cir. 2006), the Court awards the hourly fees of both Plaintiff’s counsel and counsel’s 20 hourly-billing support staff. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s evidence supports an 21 attorney fee award of $1,071 and costs of $485. Dkt. # 8-1 at 6. 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 1 V. CONCLUSION 2 For the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED that: 3 (1) Default judgment is entered in favor of Northwest Administrators Inc. and 4 against CY Expo LLC; and, 5 (2) Default judgment is for the total amount of $4,941.80.

6 7 Dated this 14th day of October, 2020. 8 A

9 10 The Honorable Richard A. Jones 11 United States District Judge

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Northwest Administrators Inc v. CY Expo LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwest-administrators-inc-v-cy-expo-llc-wawd-2020.