Northern Pacific Railroad v. Scott & Holston Lumber Co.

75 N.W. 737, 73 Minn. 25, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 745
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 15, 1898
DocketNos. 11,050-(144)
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 75 N.W. 737 (Northern Pacific Railroad v. Scott & Holston Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Scott & Holston Lumber Co., 75 N.W. 737, 73 Minn. 25, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 745 (Mich. 1898).

Opinion

START, O. J.

This was an action to determine adverse claims to certain lands and submerged lands lying on and in the Bay of St. Louis. The trial in the court below involved the rights of the respective parties to several tracts or lots, with the riparian rights appurtenant thereto, but on this appeal the contest is limited to the question of the ownership of the submerged lands or riparian rights originally in[28]*28cident to the lands which were afterwards platted as odd-numbered' lots 341 to 351, both inclusive, of block 14, Duluth Proper, SecondDivision. The trial court made its findings of fact upon this question, and found that the plaintiff: company was the owner of such riparian rights, and that the defendant had no title or interest thereto or therein, and ordered judgment accordingly. The defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The only error assigned is that the conclusions of law are not justified by the facts found, which are, so far as here material, substantially these:

In the year 1869 the Western Land Association owned the lands and adjacent shores of one corner of the Bay of St. Louis, lying at the base of Rice’s Point on its westerly side. The Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad Company in that year constructed along certain of the submerged lands, and some distance from the shore, its railway track, which its successors have ever since kept and maintained. In 1870 the Western Land Association made and filed for record the plat of Duluth Proper, Second Division, which embraces the premises in question. A copy of this plat, marked “Exhibit A,” so far as here material, was made a part of the court’s findings and appears on pages 30 and 31. On this plat, and on the southerly side of block 14, there was marked an- alley, designated on the plat as “30-Foot Alley.” The lots in the southerly half of block 14 front on this alley and the odd-numbered lots 341 to 351 extend into the water. Immediately in front of this alley, and towards the line of navigable water, lines were drawn on the plat, inclosing a tract of submerged land 200 feet in width, extending from block J on the east to block K on the west through the waters of the bay. The southerly line of this tract is the outermost line from the southerly half of block 14 into the bay, and is marked on the plat, “Property Line of L. S. & M. R. R.” So far as appears from the evidence, the Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad Company had no title to this tract 200 feet in width at the time the plat was made and recorded, ■other than may be implied, if at all, from its railway track being thereon, and from the plat itself. But thereafter, and on March 1, 1873, the Western Land Association by special warranty deed conveyed this tract to the Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad Com-[29]*29pan y, and the plaintiff has succeeded to its title thereto. The assoT ciation by the same deed also conveyed certain lots in blocks J, K, and G-, in the same plat,

“Including all riparian rights and privileges belonging to any and all of the above described tracts, except such rights and privileges belonging to said lots in block K.”

Then follows a separate description of the tract 200 feet in width above referred to, without any express mention of riparian rights. In 1874 the Western Land Association executed to the plaintiff a quitclaim deed of all that part of certain specified government lots and fractional 40s lying between St. Louis Bay and the southerly line of the 200-foot strip or railway right of way as shown on Exhibit A, including the water front and riparian rights and privileges thereto belonging. On March 15, 1872, the Western Land Association conveyed lots 341 to 351 in block 14 to B. S. Bus-sell, from whom they passed by mesne conveyance to the defendant; and after the commencement of this action, and on November 16, 1895, the Western Land Association executed to the defendant its quitclaim deed of

“All that part of block 14 in Duluth Proper, Second Division, according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies on the southerly side of the center line of the alley dividing the said block into two parts, together with all the riparian rights and privileges now or at any time heretofore incident or appurtenant to said lands.”

The land here in controversy is vacant and unoccupied. It was conceded by counsel for defendant on the argument that the riparian rights originally belonging to the land which is indicated on the plat as block 14 were severed therefrom by force of the plat of Duluth Proper, Second Division, and that they did not pass to Bus-sell by the Western Land Association’s deed to him; but it is denied that such rights were, by the plat, annexed to or became incident to the submerged tract marked on the plat, which was subsequently conveyed to the railway company. The defendant’s claim is that the plat shows no intention on the part of the Western Land Association at that time to utilize its riparian rights by platting generally its submerged land into lots, blocks, streets, piers or slips; and,

[30]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. Carroll
180 S.W. 630 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Rasmussen v. Walker Warehouse Co.
136 P. 661 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1913)
Gridley v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
126 N.W. 897 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Grant v. Oregon Navigation Co.
90 P. 178 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 N.W. 737, 73 Minn. 25, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-pacific-railroad-v-scott-holston-lumber-co-minn-1898.