Norse v. City of Santa Cruz
598 F.3d 1061, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5210, 2010 WL 963171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Norse v. City of Santa Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 F.3d 966 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2010·No. No. 07-15814; D.C. No. CV-02-01479-RMW·Published
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonreeused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norse v. City of Santa Cruz, 598 F.3d 1061, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5210, 2010 WL 963171 (9th Cir. 2010).
598 F.3d 1061 (Norse v. City of Santa Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.