Norman v. Trans Union LLC
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Noe □□ FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 8/20/24 □□ KX RUTH NOEMI NORMAN, : Plaintiff, : 1:23-cv-9245-GHW -V - : ORDER EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, : INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, — : LLC, and'TRANS UNION LLC, : Defendants. :
one KX GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: On September 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a letter requesting an extension of the deadline to submit objections to Judge Cott’s Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal of Plaintiffs claims. Dkt. No. 60. Although the letter is dated August 13, the letter was not filed until September 6, 2024. Id. The Court has already entered judgment dismissing Plaintiffs claims with prejudice, without leave to amend, as of August 21, 2024. Dkt. No. 59. Because this case is closed, Plaintiff's request 1s denied as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 9, 2024 Z a Wl ved New York, New York GREG WOODS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norman v. Trans Union LLC (Norman v. Trans Union LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.