Norman v. Trans Union LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 21, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-09245·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX RUTH NOEMI NORMAN, Plaintiff, -against- 23 CIVIL 9245 (GHW) JUDGMENT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and TRANS UNION LLC, Defendant. wen KX

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated August 20, 2024, As the R&R points out, Plaintiff has now had multiple opportunities to plead her claims, as well as the benefit of the Court's analysis on defendants’ prior motion to dismiss. R&R at 11. Plaintiff has provided no indication in her submissions that she has a colorable FCRA claim, such that a third opportunity to amend could cure the SAC's pleading deficiencies. Accordingly, Plaintiff's FCRA claims are dismissed with prejudice, without leave to amend. TechnoMarine, 758 F.3d at 506; Selvam v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc., No. 13-CV-6078 DLI JO, 2015 WL 1034891, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2015). Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Trans Union LLC. Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York August 21, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court

BY: ty Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norman v. Trans Union LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Norman v. Trans Union LLC (Norman v. Trans Union LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.