Norman v. Trans Union LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX RUTH NOEMI NORMAN, Plaintiff, -against- 23 CIVIL 9245 (GHW) JUDGMENT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and TRANS UNION LLC, Defendant. wen KX
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated August 20, 2024, As the R&R points out, Plaintiff has now had multiple opportunities to plead her claims, as well as the benefit of the Court's analysis on defendants’ prior motion to dismiss. R&R at 11. Plaintiff has provided no indication in her submissions that she has a colorable FCRA claim, such that a third opportunity to amend could cure the SAC's pleading deficiencies. Accordingly, Plaintiff's FCRA claims are dismissed with prejudice, without leave to amend. TechnoMarine, 758 F.3d at 506; Selvam v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc., No. 13-CV-6078 DLI JO, 2015 WL 1034891, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2015). Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Trans Union LLC. Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York August 21, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court
BY: ty Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norman v. Trans Union LLC (Norman v. Trans Union LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.