Nix v. United States

131 F.2d 857, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 1942
DocketNo. 10310
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 131 F.2d 857 (Nix v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nix v. United States, 131 F.2d 857, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969 (5th Cir. 1942).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted June 21, 1937, and sentenced to pay a fine of $10,-000 and to serve ten years in the penitentiary, and the execution of the imprisonment sentence was suspended and appellant put on probation. On April 23, 1942, his probation was revoked and the imprisonment sentence was reduced to two years. The next day he filed a notice of appeal to this Court, stating as grounds of appeal only rulings made during the trial in 1937. No record on appeal was ever prepared and filed in this Court. On the call of the case on November 4, 1942, the United States moved to dismiss the appeal. The appellant moved to be allowed to prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis and for further time to prepare the record.

The statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 832, permits the trial court to prevent an appeal in forma pauperis by a certificate in writing that in its opinion the appeal is not taken in good faith. Ordinarily application ought to be made to the trial court, that opportunity may be given the trial court so to certify. But the appellate court also can grant an appeal in forma pauperis, but the grant rests in the discretion of the court, and will be denied if the appeal appears not to be meritorious. Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 236 U.S. 43, 35 S.Ct. 236, 59 L.Ed. 457. The present appeal is without merit. Every ground urged relates to the trial in 1937. The judgment of conviction occurred then, and an appeal from it must, under Rule III for Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. following section 688, be taken within five days, unless a motion for new trial be made. Fewox v. United States, 5 Cir., 77 F.2d 699; Miller v. United States, 5 Cir., 104 F.2d 343; United States v. Tousey, 7 Cir., 101 F.2d 892. No provision is made for delaying appeal because of the putting of the defendant on probation. Probation does not set aside the judgment of conviction, but itself involves a judgment of conviction, even when the imposition of sentence is suspended, because probation can only be visited on a convict, and is itself a form of mild punishment. Cooper v. United States, 5 Cir., 91 F.2d 195. If the probated convict is dissatisfied at his conviction he can and must appeal at once. This appellant is far too late. The appeal being without merit, the application to prosecute it in forma pauperis is denied. The appeal itself is dismissed for want of due prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
873 S.W.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Green v. State
706 S.W.2d 653 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Davis v. State
623 S.W.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
United States v. Holley
444 F. Supp. 1361 (D. Maryland, 1977)
People v. Pickett
215 N.W.2d 695 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. Longmore
134 N.W.2d 66 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)
Pedorella v. Hoffman
165 A.2d 721 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1960)
United States v. Robinson
361 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1960)
People v. Vélez Meléndez
76 P.R. 135 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1954)
El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Vélez Meléndez
76 P.R. Dec. 142 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1954)
United States v. Rosenstriech
204 F.2d 321 (Second Circuit, 1953)
United States v. Rosenstreich
204 F.2d 321 (Second Circuit, 1953)
Brady v. State
34 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Paddy v. United States
143 F.2d 847 (Ninth Circuit, 1944)
In re Taylor
139 F.2d 1018 (Seventh Circuit, 1944)
Korematsu v. United States
319 U.S. 432 (Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 F.2d 857, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nix-v-united-states-ca5-1942.