Nilsen v. Long Island Railroad

268 A.D. 782, 48 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3459
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 1944·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The infant plaintiff, six years of age, was engaged with other boys in playing with a ball on a lot owned by defendant, adjacent to and south of its right of way, inclusive of tracks on a main line and spurs leading to an engine yard. The boy, in order to retrieve a batted ball, went down an incline and across two or more tracks of defendant to the top of a concrete abutment or wall underneath a bridge carrying a highway over the right of way, and stepped therefrom to the roof of a freight ear. In order to balance himself, he grasped a live catenary wire which was two or more feet above the top of the car and seventeen and a half feet above the rails, the height of the wire being governed by the height of the bridge at this point, and was badly burned and injured. Judgment for plaintiff reversed on the law, without costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, without costs. Appeal from order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial dismissed, without costs, [783] In the light of all the circumstances, inclusive of the fact that the boy was a trespasser, the happening of the accident was not within the range of reasonable anticipation on the part of the defendant. (Walsh v. F. R. R. Co., 145 N. Y. 301; Mendelowitz v. Neisner, 258 N. Y. 181; Tymon v. M. L. S. Construction Co., 262 N. Y. 161; Adams v. Bullock, 227 N. Y. 208; Krowtzoff v. Long Island R. R. Co., 242 App. Div. 834, leave to appeal denied, 266 N. Y. lv; Erie R. R. Co. v. Hilt, 247 U. S. 97; Donnelly v. Long Island, R. R. Co., 252 App. Div. 857; Balff v. Long Island R. R. Co., 266 App. Div. 794, affd. 292 N. Y. 656.) The findings of fact implicit in the verdict are affirmed. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nilsen v. Long Island Railroad, 268 A.D. 782, 48 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 782 (Nilsen v. Long Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Connor v. G & R Packing Co.
74 A.D.2d 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Lederman v. New York City Transit Authority
36 Misc. 2d 571 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Lo Casto v. Long Island Rail Road
7 A.D.2d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Scholl v. New York Central Railroad
2 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Van Houten v. Long Island Railroad
279 A.D. 1099 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Gallagher v. Citizens Water Works
278 A.D. 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Rand v. Long Island Rail Road
197 Misc. 744 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Sadowski v. Long Island Railroad
268 A.D. 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)