Donnelly v. Long Island Rail Road
This text of 252 A.D. 857 (Donnelly v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The infant plaintiff was injured while crossing the freight yard of the defendant by coming in contact with the third rail. Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county in favor of infant plaintiff for his injuries and in favor of the adult plaintiff for medical expenses [858]*858reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Appeal from order dismissed. Assuming that the defendant allowed the public to cross its yards by following the cobblestone driveway from Main and Center streets toward Jackson street and thence across its tracks to Jackson street, the infant plaintiff was not injured while passing along this driveway. Consequently, he was not a licensee but a trespasser and cannot recover under the facts in this case. (Englehardt v. Central New England Railway Co., 139 App. Div. 786, and cases therein cited.) Carswell, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 857, 299 N.Y.S. 464, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnelly-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1937.