Nightingale v. Mayor of Brunswick

114 S.E. 584, 29 Ga. App. 184, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 142
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1922·No. 13762·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworti-i, J.

Tlie petition for certiorari in this case is fatally defective. No pauper affidavit was filed with, it, nor was a copy of the certiorari bond required by law incorporated in the petition, nor was a certified copy of such a bond attached to said petition as an exhibit, nor does the petition show that the bond alleged to have been given complied with any of the mandatory provisions of the act of 1910 (Park’s Ann. Code, § 5191(a) ). An allegation that the petitioner had given “ the bond required by law in such cases ” is a mere conclusion. Freeman v. City of La-Grange, 27 Ga. App. 46, 47 (107 S. E. 380), and cases cited; Russell v. City of Columbus, 25 Ga. App. 16 (102 S. E. 381); Williams v. City of Dublin, 24 Ga. App. 358 (100 S. E. 777); Powell v. City of Dublin, 24 Ga. App. 359 (100 S. E. 777); Andrews v. City of Edison, 21 Ga. App. 292 (94 S. E. 282); Johns v. City of Tifton, 122 Ga. 734 (50 S. E. 941). Under the rulings in the above and a number of other cases in this court, the judge did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nightingale v. Mayor of Brunswick, 114 S.E. 584, 29 Ga. App. 184, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 142 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

114 S.E. 584 (Nightingale v. Mayor of Brunswick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
53 S.E.2d 120 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)