Russell v. City of Columbus

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Russell v. City of Columbus

102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 16, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 556

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1920·No. 10993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

In this case no certified copy of the bond is attached to the petition for certiorari, nor does the petition set forth the essentia] facts that would enable the superior court judge to decide whether a proper bond was given, and, therefore, the case falls squarely within the rule laid down in Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), and cit. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

In this case no certified copy of the bond is attached to the petition for certiorari, nor does the petition set forth the essentia] facts that would enable the superior court judge to decide whether a proper bond was given, and, therefore, the case falls squarely within the rule laid down in Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), and cit. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Russell v. City of Columbus, 102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 16, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 556 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

102 S.E. 381 (Russell v. City of Columbus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related