Andrews v. City of Edison

94 S.E. 282, 21 Ga. App. 292, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 563
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1917
Docket8986
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 282 (Andrews v. City of Edison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. City of Edison, 94 S.E. 282, 21 Ga. App. 292, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 563 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

It appearing from the record that there was not “attached to the petition a certified copy of the bond, together with a certificate from the clerk of the court that the bond was filed with him and was approved and accepted by him,” and no pauper affidavit having been made, under the ruling in Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), the judge properly “overruled and denied” the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barlow v. City of Hawkinsville
128 S.E. 817 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Nightingale v. Mayor of Brunswick
114 S.E. 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 282, 21 Ga. App. 292, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-city-of-edison-gactapp-1917.