Newell v. Saif Corp.

896 P.2d 16, 134 Or. App. 625, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 816
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 31, 1995
DocketWCB 92-09328; CA A81960
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 896 P.2d 16 (Newell v. Saif Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newell v. Saif Corp., 896 P.2d 16, 134 Or. App. 625, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 816 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of the Board’s order holding that it lacked jurisdiction to determine whether surgery proposed by her physician was a reasonable and necessary medical treatment for her condition and upholding employer’s partial denial of her claim for symptoms in her right forearm and hand.

As SAIF concedes, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co., 320 Or 189, 880 P2d 923 (1994), the Hearings Division of the Board has jurisdiction to consider the appropriateness of the proposed treatment for claimant’s compensable de Quervain’s condition. Accordingly, we remand for the Board to consider this question.

With respect to claimant’s claim for symptoms in her right forearm and hand, we affirm the Board’s opinion without discussion.

Reversed and remanded. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Consumer & Business Services v. Lopez
911 P.2d 976 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Newell v. SAIF Corp.
902 P.2d 600 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
896 P.2d 16, 134 Or. App. 625, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newell-v-saif-corp-orctapp-1995.