Newell v. Saif Corp.

896 P.2d 16, 134 Or. App. 625, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 816
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 31, 1995·No. WCB 92-09328; CA A81960·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of the Board’s order holding that it lacked jurisdiction to determine whether surgery proposed by her physician was a reasonable and necessary medical treatment for her condition and upholding employer’s partial denial of her claim for symptoms in her right forearm and hand.

As SAIF concedes, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co., 320 Or 189, 880 P2d 923 (1994), the Hearings Division of the Board has jurisdiction to consider the appropriateness of the proposed treatment for claimant’s compensable de Quervain’s condition. Accordingly, we remand for the Board to consider this question.

With respect to claimant’s claim for symptoms in her right forearm and hand, we affirm the Board’s opinion without discussion.

Reversed and remanded. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newell v. Saif Corp., 896 P.2d 16, 134 Or. App. 625, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 816 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

896 P.2d 16 (Newell v. Saif Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Consumer & Business Services v. Lopez
911 P.2d 976 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Newell v. SAIF Corp.
902 P.2d 600 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)