Newdow v. U.S. Congress
Opinions
Opinion by Judge GOODWIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ.
ORDER
The opinion filed June 26, 2002 [292 F.3d 597
The Clerk is also instructed not to accept for filing any new petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc in this case.
With the opinion thus amended, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing.
The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35.
[469]*469The petitions for rehearing are DENIED and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
See amended opinion by Judge Goodwin infra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
328 F.3d 466 (Newdow v. U.S. Congress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.