Newdow v. U.S. Congress

313 F.3d 506

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Newdow v. U.S. Congress. Read the opinion of the Court — 328 F.3d 466 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2002·No. No. 00-16423·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Sandra Banning’s motion for leave to intervene is DENIED.

The State of California’s purported appearance in this appeal is rejected, and its purported petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed July 25, 2002, is ORDERED STRICKEN.

Newdow’s motion for judicial notice is DENIED.

Newdow’s motion for sanctions against Banning’s attorneys is DENIED.

Sandra Banning’s application for leave to file sur-response to Newdow’s motion for sanctions IS DENIED.

Newdow’s motion to file response to federal and state defendants’ supplemental briefs is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Sandra Banning’s motion for leave to intervene is DENIED.

The State of California’s purported appearance in this appeal is rejected, and its purported petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed July 25, 2002, is ORDERED STRICKEN.

Newdow’s motion for judicial notice is DENIED.

Newdow’s motion for sanctions against Banning’s attorneys is DENIED.

Sandra Banning’s application for leave to file sur-response to Newdow’s motion for sanctions IS DENIED.

Newdow’s motion to file response to federal and state defendants’ supplemental briefs is DENIED.

Newdow v. U.S. Congress, 313 F.3d 506 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

313 F.3d 506 (Newdow v. U.S. Congress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.