Newberry v. Tenant

49 S.E. 621, 121 Ga. 561, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 230
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 21, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 49 S.E. 621 (Newberry v. Tenant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newberry v. Tenant, 49 S.E. 621, 121 Ga. 561, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 230 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Candler, J.

1. A statement in a bill of. exceptions, that “plaintiff excepts to said verdict and judgment as being contrary to law,” is not a valid assignment of error and will not be considered by this court. Rodgers v. Black, 99 Ga. 142.

2. A direct bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, wbiob does not assign error upon any final judgment, will not be entertained by this court. Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co., 120 Ga. 899.

S. Accordingly, where the only attempt to assign error upon a final judgment was ineffective for the reason stated in the first headnote above, and every other assignment of error was in the form of a direct exception to a ruling made pendente lite, the writ of error must be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mullinax v. McNabb-Wadsworth Truck Co.
117 F.R.D. 694 (N.D. Georgia, 1987)
State Highway Department v. McClain
114 S.E.2d 125 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Vick v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Coolidge
70 S.E.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Carpenter v. State Ex Rel. Hains
21 S.E.2d 643 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Federal Land Bank v. Bank of Lenox
16 S.E.2d 9 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Greenfield v. Harvey
11 S.E.2d 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Wood v. Fairfax Loan & Investment Co.
177 S.E. 260 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Hagan v. Hudson Insurance
173 S.E. 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Hennessee v. Jennings
172 S.E. 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Owen
168 S.E. 88 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Brown Tire Co.
168 S.E. 75 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Hunt v. State
144 S.E. 148 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Magid v. Byrd
139 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Farmer v. White Sewing Machine Co.
116 S.E. 224 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Kelly v. Shores-Mueller Co.
95 S.E. 732 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Woodall v. Harris
95 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards
85 S.E. 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Ocean Steamship Co. v. Blumberg & Sons
86 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Ocean Steamship Co. v. McDuffie
65 S.E. 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Callaway v. City of Atlanta
64 S.E. 1105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 S.E. 621, 121 Ga. 561, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newberry-v-tenant-ga-1904.