Newberry v. Tenant
This text of 49 S.E. 621 (Newberry v. Tenant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A statement in a bill of. exceptions, that “plaintiff excepts to said verdict and judgment as being contrary to law,” is not a valid assignment of error and will not be considered by this court. Rodgers v. Black, 99 Ga. 142.
2. A direct bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, wbiob does not assign error upon any final judgment, will not be entertained by this court. Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co., 120 Ga. 899.
S. Accordingly, where the only attempt to assign error upon a final judgment was ineffective for the reason stated in the first headnote above, and every other assignment of error was in the form of a direct exception to a ruling made pendente lite, the writ of error must be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 S.E. 621, 121 Ga. 561, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newberry-v-tenant-ga-1904.