Rodgers v. Black

25 S.E. 21, 99 Ga. 141
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 8, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 25 S.E. 21 (Rodgers v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodgers v. Black, 25 S.E. 21, 99 Ga. 141 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

A refusal to grant a new trial on the general grounds that the verdiot was contrary to law and the evidence, will not be reversed when it appears that the evidence offered by the prevailing party, though decidedly in conflict with that introduced upon the other side, was sufficient to support the verdict.

J udgm&nt affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 21, 99 Ga. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-v-black-ga-1896.