New York State Employees' Retirement System v. Board of Supervisors

251 A.D. 198, 296 N.Y.S. 286, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6894
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 12, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 251 A.D. 198 (New York State Employees' Retirement System v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York State Employees' Retirement System v. Board of Supervisors, 251 A.D. 198, 296 N.Y.S. 286, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a peremptory order of mandamus. The board of supervisors of the county of Tioga adopted a resolution on December 15, 1930, approving the inclusion of its officers and employees in the State Retirement System which fully complied with section 75 of article 5 of the Civil Service Law of the State.

In pursuance of the resolution making the officers and employees a part of the Retirement System some forty-eight employees became members and thereafter and on March 2,1931, the board of supervisors adopted a resolution rescinding the resolution of inclusion. This was done on the ground that the information given to the board of supervisors before the adoption by a representative of the Comptroller’s office, while innocently given, was erroneous and that they were induced by such erroneous statements to adopt the resolution in the first instance.

The power conferred by section 75 of the Civil Service Law upon the board of supervisors to approve of the entry of county officers and employees into the New York State Retirement System is permissive and when the board has legally granted its approval it has not the power to either revoke or rescind the same and the peremptory order of mandamus should be affirmed, with costs.

McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, with an opinion, in which Heffernan, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capital District Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. v. Levitt
65 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
State Ex Rel. McDaniel v. Duffield
138 S.E.2d 351 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1964)
County of Cayuga v. McHugh
152 N.E.2d 73 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)
County of Cayuga v. McHugh
3 A.D.2d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
People Ex Rel. Schuwerk v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
128 N.E.2d 923 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1955)
Siegel v. Mangan
258 A.D. 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 198, 296 N.Y.S. 286, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-state-employees-retirement-system-v-board-of-supervisors-nyappdiv-1937.