New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The Express

Second Circuit

New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The Express

59 F. 476, 8 C.C.A. 182, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 13, 1892

DocketNo. 38

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 59 F. 476 (New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The Express, 59 F. 476, 8 C.C.A. 182, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541 (2d Cir. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The party who appeals from a decree in his favor in a cause of collision is not entitled to interest on the original recovery pending the appeal. Interest, in such cases, is given for delay in satisfying a decree. The party wrho appeals puts it out of the power of the opposite party to pay the decree. The Rebecca Clyde, 12 Blatchf. 403; Hemmenway v. Fisher, 20 How. 260; The Blenheim, 18 Fed. 47.

The motion to amend the mandate is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The party who appeals from a decree in his favor in a cause of collision is not entitled to interest on the original recovery pending the appeal. Interest, in such cases, is given for delay in satisfying a decree. The party wrho appeals puts it out of the power of the opposite party to pay the decree. The Rebecca Clyde, 12 Blatchf. 403; Hemmenway v. Fisher, 20 How. 260; The Blenheim, 18 Fed. 47.

The motion to amend the mandate is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F. 476, 8 C.C.A. 182, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-cuba-mail-steamship-co-v-the-express-ca2-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack