New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The Express
59 F. 476, 8 C.C.A. 182, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 13, 1892·No. No. 38·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The party who appeals from a decree in his favor in a cause of collision is not entitled to interest on the original recovery pending the appeal. Interest, in such cases, is given for delay in satisfying a decree. The party wrho appeals puts it out of the power of the opposite party to pay the decree. The Rebecca Clyde, 12 Blatchf. 403; Hemmenway v. Fisher, 20 How. 260; The Blenheim, 18 Fed. 47.
The motion to amend the mandate is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The Express, 59 F. 476, 8 C.C.A. 182, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541 (2d Cir. 1892).
59 F. 476 (New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lauro v. United States
168 F.2d 714 (Second Circuit, 1948)
United States v. 125.71 Acres of Land in Loyalhanna Tp.
54 F. Supp. 193 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1944)
State Ex Rel. Southern Real Estate & Financial Co. v. City of St. Louis
115 S.W.2d 513 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1938)
American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Skagit River Navigation & Trading Co.
91 F.2d 835 (Ninth Circuit, 1937)
The S. V. Luckenbach
197 F. 893 (Second Circuit, 1912)
The Charles E. Matthews
173 F. 1020 (Second Circuit, 1909)
The Banes
147 F. 192 (Second Circuit, 1906)