The Banes

Second Circuit

The Banes

147 F. 192, 77 C.C.A. 420, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4214

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 24, 1906

DocketNo. 264

StatusPublished

This text of 147 F. 192 (The Banes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Banes, 147 F. 192, 77 C.C.A. 420, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4214 (2d Cir. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although not prepared to hold that the libelant should be mulcted, because it attached a disappearing cargo, nevertheless, in view of the circumstance that the shipowner disclosed the situation of the cargo and promptly offered to give security for the full amount of any claim against it, we concur fully in the conclusion of the district judge, and affirm the decree without interest, pending appeal, and with a single bill-of costs in this court to the appellees.

See N. Y. & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. The Express, 59 Fed. 476, 8 C. C. A. 182.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although not prepared to hold that the libelant should be mulcted, because it attached a disappearing cargo, nevertheless, in view of the circumstance that the shipowner disclosed the situation of the cargo and promptly offered to give security for the full amount of any claim against it, we concur fully in the conclusion of the district judge, and affirm the decree without interest, pending appeal, and with a single bill-of costs in this court to the appellees.

See N. Y. & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. The Express, 59 Fed. 476, 8 C. C. A. 182.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 F. 192, 77 C.C.A. 420, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-banes-ca2-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack