The Charles E. Matthews

173 F. 1020, 97 C.C.A. 667, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5130
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 29, 1909·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision in The Express, 59 Fed. 476, 8 C. C. A. 182, applies. In the first of'the above causes the interest to which libelant is entitled should be paid by the interests which, by appealing, tied up the litigation. In the second cause no interest should be allowed upon that part of the decree payable by the Matthews. We are not inclined to allow the claim for premiums paid on account of the stipulations for value. The decrees may be amended accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Charles E. Matthews, 173 F. 1020, 97 C.C.A. 667, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5130 (2d Cir. 1909).

173 F. 1020 (The Charles E. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related