The Charles E. Matthews

Second Circuit

The Charles E. Matthews

173 F. 1020, 97 C.C.A. 667, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5130

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 173 F. 1020 (The Charles E. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Charles E. Matthews, 173 F. 1020, 97 C.C.A. 667, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5130 (2d Cir. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision in The Express, 59 Fed. 476, 8 C. C. A. 182, applies. In the first of'the above causes the interest to which libelant is entitled should be paid by the interests which, by appealing, tied up the litigation. In the second cause no interest should be allowed upon that part of the decree payable by the Matthews. We are not inclined to allow the claim for premiums paid on account of the stipulations for value. The decrees may be amended accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decision in The Express, 59 Fed. 476, 8 C. C. A. 182, applies. In the first of'the above causes the interest to which libelant is entitled should be paid by the interests which, by appealing, tied up the litigation. In the second cause no interest should be allowed upon that part of the decree payable by the Matthews. We are not inclined to allow the claim for premiums paid on account of the stipulations for value. The decrees may be amended accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 F. 1020, 97 C.C.A. 667, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-charles-e-matthews-ca2-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack