New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily

12 Ind. 551
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 23, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 12 Ind. 551 (New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily, 12 Ind. 551 (Ind. 1859).

Opinion

Perkins, J.

This was a complaint for an injunction [552]*552and a writ of assessment of damages against The New Albany cmd Salem Railroad Company, because said company was proceeding to lay a track of their road along a certain street in the city of Lafayette, in front of the lot of -A-11 injunction was granted, &c. '

II. W. Chase, I. A. Wilstach, S. C. Willson, and J. E. McDonald, for the appellants.

A railroad in a city is not, necessarily, a nuisance, and the injunction cannot be sustained on that ground. Ang. on Highw., p. 217. See Wood v. Mears, at this term

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of New Castle v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad
57 N.E. 516 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1900)
Snyder v. Fort Madison Street Railway Co.
41 L.R.A. 345 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Nichols v. Ann Arbor & Ypsilanti Street Railway Co.
16 L.R.A. 371 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
State v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
86 Ind. 114 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. Heisel
38 Mich. 62 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)
Pacific Railroad v. Leavenworth
18 F. Cas. 953 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas, 1871)
Hobart v. Milwaukee City Railroad
27 Wis. 194 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1870)
Carson v. Cent. R.R.
35 Cal. 325 (California Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Ind. 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-albany-salem-railroad-v-odaily-ind-1859.