New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily

13 Ind. 353
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1859·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Perkins, J.

This was a proceeding for the assessment of damages occasioned by the laying of a track of the New Albany and Salem, Railroad. The track was laid in a public street in the city of Lafayette, in front of O ’Daily’s property. The proceedings for the assessment of damages were under the act of 1852 (2 R. S. p. 193, § 710), and were instituted by O’Daily.

The fee simple in the streets of towns and cities in Indiana, would seem, during the existence of the corporation, to be-in the public. At all events, this Court has decided that taking a street is not talcing an “interest in the land” of the adjoining proprietor. Protzman v. The Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad Co., 9 Ind. R. 467.

Yet it is only when such interest is taken, that the act of 1852 authorizes this proceeding for the assessment of damages. Hence, this suit could not be sustained under it. See The Lafayette, &c., Plankroad Co. v. The New Albany, &c., Railroad Co., at this term

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily, 13 Ind. 353 (Ind. 1859).

13 Ind. 353 (New Albany & Salem Railroad v. O'Daily) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Ann Arbor & Ypsilanti Street Railway Co.
16 L.R.A. 371 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
Spencer v. Point Pleasant & Ohio R. R.
23 W. Va. 406 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1884)
Perry v. New Orleans, Mobile & Chattanooga Railroad
55 Ala. 413 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago Railroad
48 Ind. 178 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Pacific Railroad v. Leavenworth
18 F. Cas. 953 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas, 1871)