Nelson v. State

616 So. 2d 84, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3041, 1993 WL 74265
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nelson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 602 So. 2d 550
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 1993·No. No. 91-3487·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the Appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw the opinion of this Court issued October 14, 1992, and substitute the following opinion.

We reverse Appellant’s conviction and sentence on the authority of Springle v. State, 613 So.2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). The secret and unauthorized tape recording of Appellant’s conversation in the back seat of a police car constitutes an invasion of his privacy and a violation of Florida Statutes Section 934.03. We note that the Appellant was not in custody, but was sitting in the car for his own safety. The tape recording and any resulting evidence is therefore inadmissible. The cause is remanded for further proceedings.

GUNTHER, STONE, JJ. and MOE, LEROY H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. State, 616 So. 2d 84, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3041, 1993 WL 74265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 84 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Springle v. State
613 So. 2d 65 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)