Nelson v. State

555 So. 2d 897, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 99, 1990 WL 950
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1990
DocketNo. 89-744
StatusPublished

This text of 555 So. 2d 897 (Nelson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. State, 555 So. 2d 897, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 99, 1990 WL 950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On appeal, Basil Nelson contends that the trial court erred in deviating from a written plea agreement he entered into with the state. Because the record shows that the court took no evidence at the sentencing hearing but instead relied upon representations of counsel, we vacate the sentence entered and remand for an evidentia-ry hearing and appropriate sentencing. “[Representations by counsel not made under oath and not subject to cross-examination, absent a stipulation, are not evidence.” State v. T.A., 528 So.2d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (citations omitted).

Sentence vacated; remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. T.A.
528 So. 2d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
555 So. 2d 897, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 99, 1990 WL 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.