Nelson v. State

600 So. 2d 1317, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8521, 1992 WL 170955
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nelson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 602 So. 2d 550
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 1992·No. No. 90-02980·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of one count of sale of cocaine and one count of possession [1318]*1318of cocaine with intent to sell, arising from a transaction which took place on September 29, 1989, and one count of sale of cocaine and one count of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, arising from a transaction which took place on October 6, 1989.

Appellant raises three arguments, only one of which requires reversal. On the face of the record, we must agree with appellant that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support his convictions arising from the September 29 transaction. We must, therefore, remand this case to the trial court with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal as to these counts. Appellant’s convictions and sentences on the remaining two counts are affirmed.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. State, 600 So. 2d 1317, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8521, 1992 WL 170955 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 1317 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.