Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
This text of 568 F.3d 1028 (Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order; Concurrence by Judge WARDLAW; Dissent by Judge [1029]*1029CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI.
ORDER
Judges Thompson, Wardlaw, and Reed voted to deny Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Wardlaw voted to deny Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Thompson and Reed so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35. Judges O’Scannlain and Ikuta were recused.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
568 F.3d 1028, 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 257, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12073, 2009 WL 1607914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-national-aeronautics-space-administration-ca9-2009.