Home/Ninth Circuit/Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration

Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration

568 F.3d 1028, 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 257, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12073, 2009 WL 1607914
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2009·No. 07-56424·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Order; Concurrence by Judge WARDLAW; Dissent by Judge [1029]*1029CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI.

ORDER

Judges Thompson, Wardlaw, and Reed voted to deny Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Wardlaw voted to deny Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Thompson and Reed so recommended.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35. Judges O’Scannlain and Ikuta were recused.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration, 568 F.3d 1028, 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 257, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12073, 2009 WL 1607914 (9th Cir. 2009).

568 F.3d 1028 (Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raymond Potlongo, Jr. v. Herff Jones, LLC
Ninth Circuit, 2018
Rubin v. Vista Del Sol Health Services, Inc.
80 F. Supp. 3d 1058 (C.D. California, 2015)
National Aeronautics & Space Administration v. Nelson
178 L. Ed. 2d 667 (Supreme Court, 2011)
Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.
719 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (C.D. California, 2009)
Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
568 F.3d 1028 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)