Naylor v. Chickamauga Quarry & Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Naylor v. Chickamauga Quarry & Construction Co.

91 S.E. 1063, 19 Ga. App. 714, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 323

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 9, 1917

Docket8027

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 1063 (Naylor v. Chickamauga Quarry & Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naylor v. Chickamauga Quarry & Construction Co., 91 S.E. 1063, 19 Ga. App. 714, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 323 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition did not set forth a cause of action, and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer. Cowart v. Southern Marble Co., 144 to. 254 (87 S. E. 282); Wadley Southern Ry. Co. v. Durden, 142 Ga. 361 (82 S. E. 1055).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and George, J., concur.

The defendant demurred to the petition on the ground that no cause of action was set forth, and by special demurrer made the contentions, among others, that the petition did not affirmatively allege facts showing why the plaintiff did not have equal means with the defendant of knowing the facts referred to; and that the petition did not allege why the premises should be inspected or what employee failed in the duty of inspection. The court sustained the general demurrer, as well as these special grounds, and dismissed the petition.

David 8. Afkinéon, for plaintiff,

cited: Austin v. Appling, 88 Ga. 54 (2); Duke v. Bibb Mfg. Co., 120 Ga. 1074; Moore v. Dublin Cotlon Mills, 127 Ga. 609 (3); Woodson v. Johnstone, 109 Ga. 454; Eagle & Phenix Mills v. Herron, 119 Ga. 389 (1); Pierce v. Seaboard Air-Line Ry., 122 Ga. 664; Southern States &c. Co. v. Helms, 2 Ga. App. 308 (1b); Green v. Babcock, 130 Ga. 469 (2); King Mfg. Co. v. Walton, 1 Ga. App. 403 (3); Ga. Railroad v. Hunter, 12 Ga. App. 294; Chenall v. Palmer, 117 Ga. 106 (4); Burns v. Ocean Steamship Co., 84 Ga. 709.

Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant,

cited: Cowart v. Southern Marble Co., 144 Ga. 254; Wadley Southern Ry. Co. v. Durden, 142 Ga. 361; 3 Labatt, Master and Servant, 2466.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The petition did not set forth a cause of action, and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer. Cowart v. Southern Marble Co., 144 to. 254 (87 S. E. 282); Wadley Southern Ry. Co. v. Durden, 142 Ga. 361 (82 S. E. 1055).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and George, J., concur.

The defendant demurred to the petition on the ground that no cause of action was set forth, and by special demurrer made the contentions, among others, that the petition did not affirmatively allege facts showing why the plaintiff did not have equal means with the defendant of knowing the facts referred to; and that the petition did not allege why the premises should be inspected or what employee failed in the duty of inspection. The court sustained the general demurrer, as well as these special grounds, and dismissed the petition.

David 8. Afkinéon, for plaintiff,

cited: Austin v. Appling, 88 Ga. 54 (2); Duke v. Bibb Mfg. Co., 120 Ga. 1074; Moore v. Dublin Cotlon Mills, 127 Ga. 609 (3); Woodson v. Johnstone, 109 Ga. 454; Eagle & Phenix Mills v. Herron, 119 Ga. 389 (1); Pierce v. Seaboard Air-Line Ry., 122 Ga. 664; Southern States &c. Co. v. Helms, 2 Ga. App. 308 (1b); Green v. Babcock, 130 Ga. 469 (2); King Mfg. Co. v. Walton, 1 Ga. App. 403 (3); Ga. Railroad v. Hunter, 12 Ga. App. 294; Chenall v. Palmer, 117 Ga. 106 (4); Burns v. Ocean Steamship Co., 84 Ga. 709.

Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant,

cited: Cowart v. Southern Marble Co., 144 Ga. 254; Wadley Southern Ry. Co. v. Durden, 142 Ga. 361; 3 Labatt, Master and Servant, 2466.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 1063, 19 Ga. App. 714, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naylor-v-chickamauga-quarry-construction-co-gactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack