NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC. v. State
This text of 704 N.W.2d 698 (NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC., NWS Michigan, Inc., and National Wine & Spirits, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE of Michigan, Defendant-Appellee, and
Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
By order of December 27, 2004, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision in Granholm v. Heald, 541 U.S. 1062, 124 S.Ct. 2389, 158 L.Ed.2d 962 (2004). On order of the Court, the opinion having been issued on May 16, 2005, Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 1885, 161 L.Ed.2d 796 (2005), the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers. The motion to strike is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 N.W.2d 698, 474 Mich. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-wine-spirits-inc-v-state-mich-2005.