Home/Supreme Court/Swedenburg v. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority

Swedenburg v. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority

541 U.S. 1062, 124 S. Ct. 2391, 158 L. Ed. 2d 962, 72 U.S.L.W. 3725, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 3699
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 24, 2004
Docket03-1274
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 541 U.S. 1062 (Swedenburg v. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swedenburg v. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority, 541 U.S. 1062, 124 S. Ct. 2391, 158 L. Ed. 2d 962, 72 U.S.L.W. 3725, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 3699 (2004).

Opinion

541 U.S. 1062

SWEDENBURG ET AL.
v.
KELLY, CHAIRMAN, NEW YORK DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, ET AL.

No. 03-1274.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 24, 2004.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Does a State's regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment?" Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: Nos. 03-1116 and 03-1120, 342 F. 3d 517; No. 03-1274, 358 F. 3d 223.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeman v. Fischer
563 F. Supp. 2d 493 (D. New Jersey, 2008)
Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States
429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (Court of International Trade, 2006)
NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC. v. State
704 N.W.2d 698 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Shewry
423 F.3d 906 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
J.W. Dewit Farms, Inc. v. Minnesota Cultivated Wild Rice Council
393 F. Supp. 2d 847 (D. Minnesota, 2005)
Arkansas Tobacco Control Board v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co.
199 S.W.3d 656 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)
DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS v. Graves Bros. Co.
889 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Shewry
384 F.3d 1126 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California
379 F.3d 1041 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Kerbeck Cadillac Pontiac, Inc. v. State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers & Salespersons
854 A.2d 663 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Kawamura
90 P.3d 1179 (California Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 U.S. 1062, 124 S. Ct. 2391, 158 L. Ed. 2d 962, 72 U.S.L.W. 3725, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 3699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swedenburg-v-kelly-chairman-new-york-division-of-alcoholic-beverage-scotus-2004.