Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v. Heald

541 U.S. 1062, 124 S. Ct. 2389
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 24, 2004·No. 03-1120·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

541 U.S. 1062

MICHIGAN BEER & WINE WHOLESALERS ASSN.
v.
HEALD ET AL.

No. 03-1120.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 24, 2004.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Does a State's regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment?" Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: Nos. 03-1116 and 03-1120, 342 F. 3d 517; No. 03-1274, 358 F. 3d 223.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v. Heald, 541 U.S. 1062, 124 S. Ct. 2389 (2004).

541 U.S. 1062 (Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v. Heald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freeman v. Fischer
563 F. Supp. 2d 493 (D. New Jersey, 2008)
NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC. v. State
704 N.W.2d 698 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Shewry
423 F.3d 906 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS v. Graves Bros. Co.
889 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Kawamura
90 P.3d 1179 (California Supreme Court, 2004)