Najera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Najera v. State

492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9514

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1986·No. No. 86-1935·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Najera appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the petition is facially sufficient to support his motion. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975); Torres v. State, 485 So.2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Rule 3.850. Thomas v. State, 490 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Copeland v. State, 492 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Owens v. State, 463 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Najera appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the petition is facially sufficient to support his motion. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975); Torres v. State, 485 So.2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Rule 3.850. Thomas v. State, 490 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Copeland v. State, 492 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Owens v. State, 463 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Najera v. State, 492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

492 So. 2d 1190 (Najera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related