Najera v. State
This text of 492 So. 2d 1190 (Najera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Najera appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the petition is facially sufficient to support his motion. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975); Torres v. State, 485 So.2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Rule 3.850. Thomas v. State, 490 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Copeland v. State, 492 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Owens v. State, 463 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/najera-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.