Thomas v. State

486 So. 2d 69, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 1986
Docket85-1018
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 486 So. 2d 69 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 486 So. 2d 69, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

486 So.2d 69 (1986)

Lindsey Lee THOMAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-1018.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 9, 1986.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Penny H. Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. At sentencing the trial court imposed a public defender's fee and advised appellant that he could contest the fee at a later date. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in imposing the fee without giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to its imposition. We agree. Section 27.56(7), Florida Statutes (1985) permits the trial court to assess a defendant for the value of the services of his public defender after adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard and offer objections. In Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984), our Supreme Court held *70 that assessment of costs was not appropriate where there was no prior notice given to the defendant that costs would be imposed against him at the sentencing hearing. The First District later held in Walker v. State, 458 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) that an assessment made in open court on the day of the sentencing hearing did not comport with the notice requirement of the statute. We strike the fee and remand this matter to the trial court without prejudice to the State to reassess the fee upon proper notice and hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of P.J.
579 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Andrews v. State
576 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Noble v. State
570 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Jacobs v. State
567 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Bradley v. State
559 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Bull v. State
548 So. 2d 1103 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Odom v. State
507 So. 2d 174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 So. 2d 69, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.