Andrews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Andrews v. State

576 So. 2d 433

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 1991

DocketNo. 90-02782

StatusPublished

This text of 576 So. 2d 433 (Andrews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. State, 576 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that it was error for the trial court to find the defendant guilty of possession of cannabis. Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987); Ashenoff v. State, 391 So.2d 289 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence and remand with instructions to the trial court to discharge the appellant in this case.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that it was error for the trial court to find the defendant guilty of possession of cannabis. Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987); Ashenoff v. State, 391 So.2d 289 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence and remand with instructions to the trial court to discharge the appellant in this case.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 So. 2d 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack