Andrews v. State
576 So. 2d 433
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Andrews v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 533 So. 2d 841 →
Opinion
The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that it was error for the trial court to find the defendant guilty of possession of cannabis. Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987); Ashenoff v. State, 391 So.2d 289 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence and remand with instructions to the trial court to discharge the appellant in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrews v. State, 576 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
576 So. 2d 433 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Velunza v. State
504 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Ashenoff v. State
391 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Munroe v. State
514 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)