Copeland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Copeland v. State

492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1986·No. No. 86-1380·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Copeland appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding that defendant might be entitled to relief if he establishes the allegations set forth in his motion, we remand for the trial court either to attach to its order those portions of the record which conclusively show that Copeland is not entitled to the relief sought or to hold an evidentiary hearing. Owens v. State, 463 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Copeland appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding that defendant might be entitled to relief if he establishes the allegations set forth in his motion, we remand for the trial court either to attach to its order those portions of the record which conclusively show that Copeland is not entitled to the relief sought or to hold an evidentiary hearing. Owens v. State, 463 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).

Remanded.

Copeland v. State, 492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

492 So. 2d 1190 (Copeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related