Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Copeland v. State

Copeland v. State

492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 1986
DocketNo. 86-1380
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 492 So. 2d 1190 (Copeland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Copeland v. State, 492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Copeland appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding that defendant might be entitled to relief if he establishes the allegations set forth in his motion, we remand for the trial court either to attach to its order those portions of the record which conclusively show that Copeland is not entitled to the relief sought or to hold an evidentiary hearing. Owens v. State, 463 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Najera v. State
492 So. 2d 1190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 So. 2d 1190, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.