NAACP of San Jose/ Silicon Valley v. City Of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California·Decided August 18, 2023·No. 4:21-cv-01705·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 NAACP OF SAN JOSE/ SILICON VALLEY, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01705-PJH 8 Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR 10 RECONSIDERATION CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 153 Defendants. 12

13 14 Plaintiffs in the above-captioned case have filed a motion for leave to file a motion 15 for reconsideration of the court’s summary judgment order; specifically, the portion of the 16 order dismissing the claims of the organizational plaintiffs. Plaintiffs argue that the 17 parties did not have an opportunity to brief the issue of organizational standing, and they 18 bring their motion based on Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(1), that a material difference in fact or 19 law exists from that which was presented to the court before entry of the order for which 20 reconsideration is sought. See Dkt. 153. 21 Plaintiffs argue that “defendants did not move to dismiss the organization 22 plaintiffs.” See Dkt. 153 at 2. However, the face of defendants’ motion makes clear that 23 “all defendants will and hereby do move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 24 for summary judgment on all claims brought by all plaintiffs.” See Dkt. 121 at 1 25 (emphasis added). While plaintiffs are correct that defendants’ arguments regarding the 26 organizational plaintiffs’ claims were made in a footnote, the fact remains that plaintiffs’ 27 opposition brief did not address the organizations’ claims at all (even in a corresponding 1 has held that arguments not raised in “opposition to summary judgment” are “waived.” 2 See, e.g., Loomis v. Cornish, 836 F.3d 991, 997 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Alaska Airlines, 3 Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536, 546 n.15 (9th Cir. 1991)). Accordingly, 4 plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration is DENIED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: August 18, 2023 7 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 8 United States District Judge

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NAACP of San Jose/ Silicon Valley v. City Of San Jose, (N.D. Cal. 2023).

NAACP of San Jose/ Silicon Valley v. City Of San Jose (NAACP of San Jose/ Silicon Valley v. City Of San Jose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Will Loomis v. Jessica Cornish
836 F.3d 991 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.
948 F.2d 536 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)