Myers v. State

980 So. 2d 1204, 2008 WL 1884004
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 2008·No. 4D08-529·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

980 So.2d 1204 (2008)

Carl MYERS a/k/a Carl Meyers, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D08-529.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 2008.

Carl Myers a/k/a Carl Meyers, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of the claim as it was alleged in appellant's initial motion. The trial court properly accepted the state's position that there was no need for the trial court to clarify the 1994 sentences associated with the 1992 cases. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (1993). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant refiling a collateral motion to present the claim as revised in his initial brief and rebuttal.

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. State, 980 So. 2d 1204, 2008 WL 1884004 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

980 So. 2d 1204 (Myers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren v. State
980 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)