Myers v. State
This text of 980 So. 2d 1204 (Myers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carl MYERS a/k/a Carl Meyers, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Carl Myers a/k/a Carl Meyers, Jasper, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of the claim as it was alleged in appellant's initial motion. The trial court properly accepted the state's position that there was no need for the trial court to clarify the 1994 sentences associated with the 1992 cases. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (1993). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant refiling a collateral motion to present the claim as revised in his initial brief and rebuttal.
WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
980 So. 2d 1204, 2008 WL 1884004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.