Myers v. State

993 So. 2d 1104, 2008 WL 4471367
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Myers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 So. 2d 1069
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 2008·No. 1D07-5532·Published

Opinion

993 So.2d 1104 (2008)

Wilfredo MYERS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D07-5532.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 7, 2008.

James T. Miller, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Special Counsel, Criminal Appeals, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Prior report: 846 So.2d 512.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, as untimely and on the merits. Although we agree with appellant that his motion was timely filed, and therefore not procedurally barred, we affirm the denial of the motion on the merits without further discussion.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, DAVIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. State, 993 So. 2d 1104, 2008 WL 4471367 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

993 So. 2d 1104 (Myers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freeburg Enterprises, Inc. v. Transportation Casualty Insurance Co.
993 So. 2d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)