Musgrave v. Arnow
This text of 497 F.2d 111 (Musgrave v. Arnow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John MUSGRAVE and Bart Savage, and all others similarly
situated, Petitioners,
v.
The Honorable Winston E. ARNOW, Chief Judge, United States
District Court For the Northern District of
Florida, Respondents.
No. 73-2776.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 11, 1974.
Stephen N. Bernstein, Gainesville, Fla., for petitioners.
William H. Stafford, Jr., U.S. Atty., Pensacola, Fla., for respondents.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Petitioners sought by mandamus to prevent the District Court from enforcing its order of July 12, 1973, which prohibited persons not parties to the case from making public statements during the pendency of the trial. The case has been fully tried resulting in judgments of acquittal and we therefore dismiss the request for relief as moot.1
For related cases see United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 102; United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 107; National Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Arnow, 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 110; Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Arnow, 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F.2d 110
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 F.2d 111, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musgrave-v-arnow-ca5-1974.