National Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Arnow
This text of 497 F.2d 110 (National Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Arnow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
497 F.2d 110
NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Television 12 of
Jacksonville, Inc., and WKRG-TV, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
The Honorable Winston E. ARNOW, Chief Judge, United States
District Court For the Northern District of
Florida, et al., Respondents.
No. 73-2691.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 11, 1974.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; Winston E. Arnow, Chief Judge.
Corydon B. Dunham, Vice Pres. & Gen. Counsel, Nat'l. Broadcasting Co., Inc., New York City, James A. McKenna, Jr., James R. Cooke, Washington, D.C., Floyd Abrams, Eugene R. Scheiman, New York City, W. Spencer Mitchem, Pensacola, Fla., Morton Stavis, Newark, N.J., Doris Peterson, New York City, for Briggs.
Larry G. Turner, Gainesville, Fla., Brady Coleman, Austin, Tex., for Briggs and others.
Talbot D'Alemberte, Miami, Fla., for Columbia.
Elliot Richardson, Atty. Gen., Erwin N. Griswold, Solicitor Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., William H. Stafford, Jr., U.S. Atty., Pensacola, Fla., for respondents.
Before DYER, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The petition for mandamus is dismissed as moot.1
See our companion opinion in United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 5 Cir., 497 F.2d 102, (No. 73-2602, July 11, 1974)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 F.2d 110, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-broadcasting-company-inc-v-arnow-ca5-1974.