Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murray v. State

692 So. 2d 965, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4145, 1997 WL 194880

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 23, 1997

DocketNo. 95-03466

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 692 So. 2d 965 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. State, 692 So. 2d 965, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4145, 1997 WL 194880 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals his judgment and sentence following the revocation of his probation. We find no merit in his argument that the trial court erred in revoking his probation and affirm. We do find, however, that the order of probation incorrectly cites the condition violated.

Appellant was found to have violated condition “M” of his probation which prohibits contact with the victim or the victim’s family. Appellee concedes that the probation order lists the condition prohibiting contact as condition “Q”. Appellant is entitled to have the order corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Boggs v. State, 557 So.2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, but remand for correction of the written order.

FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI