Murray v. State

648 So. 2d 327, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 309, 1995 WL 18395
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1995
DocketNo. 94-696
StatusPublished

This text of 648 So. 2d 327 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. State, 648 So. 2d 327, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 309, 1995 WL 18395 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Lee Murray appeals the imposition of adult sanctions following his plea to one count of robbery with a firearm and three counts of kidnapping with intent to commit a felony with a weapon. We reverse. Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993); Parks v. State, 637 So.2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Upon remand, the trial court may [328]*328again impose adult sanctions if the findings required by Troutman can be made.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parks v. State
637 So. 2d 347 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 So. 2d 327, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 309, 1995 WL 18395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.