Murray v. State

677 So. 2d 70, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7607, 1996 WL 390921
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1996·No. No. 95-212·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in imposing a public defender’s lien without giving the appellant notice of his right to a hearing to contest the amount. See Brown v. State, 672 So.2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Neal v. State, 669 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Kirby v. State, 658 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, the imposition of the public defender’s lien is vacated. On remand, a lien may again be imposéd, provided that appellant is given notice and an opportunity to contest its amount. The judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. State, 677 So. 2d 70, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7607, 1996 WL 390921 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

677 So. 2d 70 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brantley v. State
692 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)