Murray v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 26, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-06023·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT LEE MURRAY, Plaintiff, -against- 24-CV-6023 (JPO) CITY OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK CITY ORDER OF SERVICE HEALTH + HOSPITALS; C.O. BOND #2413; DOCTOR JOHN DOE, Defendants. J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently detained on Rikers Island, in the custody of the New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”), brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his federally protected rights. By order dated October 2, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 DISCUSSION A. Service on New York City and DOC Defendant The Clerk of Court is directed to notify DOC and the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that the City of New York and C.O. Bond #2413 waive service of summons.

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). B. Service on New York City Health + Hospitals Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . .. in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to

serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendant New York City Health + Hospitals through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for Defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendant. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service).

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. C. John Doe Doctor Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff may supply

2Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date any summonses issue. sufficient information to permit H+H to identify the John Doe doctor named in the complaint. It is therefore ordered that H+H and the Physician Affiliate Group of New York, P.C. (“PAGNY”) must ascertain the identity of the John Doe doctor whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where the defendant may be served. H+H or PAGNY must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order.

Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint naming the John Doe defendant. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for the named John Doe Defendant and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to electronically notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that

Defendants City of New York and C.O. Bond #2413 waive service of summons. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons for New York City Health + Hospitals, complete the USM-285 form with the address for Defendant, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Court additionally directs the Clerk of Court to mail copies of this order and copies of the complaint to: (1) NYC Health + Hospitals, 50 Water Street, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10004; and (2) Physician Affiliate Group of New York, P.C., 55 West 125th Street, Suite 1001, New York, New York 10027. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. An amended complaint form is attached to this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 26, 2024 New York, New York

J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge

SERVICE ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANT

New York City Health + Hospitals 50 Water Street, 17th Floor New York, N.Y. 10004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW Y O R K

(In the space above enter the full name(s) of the plaintiff(s).) AMENDED COMPLAINT -against- under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Jury Trial: Q Yes Q No (check one) ____ Civ. _________ ( ) (In the space above enter the full name(s) of the defendant(s). If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed in the above caption must be identical to those contained in Part I. Addresses should not be included here.) I. Parties in this complaint: A. List your name, identification number, and the name and address of your current place of confinement. Do the same for any additional plaintiffs named. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary. Plaintiff’s Name_____________________________________________________________ ID#_______________________________________________________________ Current Institution___________________________________________________ Address___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ B. List all defendants’ names, positions, places of employment, and the address where each defendant may be served. Make sure that the defendant(s) listed below are identical to those contained in the above caption. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary. Defendant No. 1 Name ___________________________________________ Shield #_________ Where Currently Employed __________________________________________ Address __________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Address __________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Defendant No.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Murray v. City of New York (Murray v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)