Murray v. City of New York

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: monn nrc nanan KK DATE FILED:_ 11/7/2023 ROBERT LEE MURRAY, : Plaintiff, : : 21-cv-6718 (LJL) -v- : : ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., : Defendants. : wee KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Defendants’ letter motion, Dkt. No. 72, is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a letter with the Court that provides a physical description of the Doe Defendants by November 29, 2023. See Bishop v. City of New York, 2016 WL 4484245, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016); Cato v. Zweller, 2023 WL 2352922, at *1-2 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2023). If Plaintiff fails to do so, Defendants will be relieved of their Valentin obligations to assist Plaintiff in identifying the Doe Defendants. See Vassel v. Palisades Funding Corp., 2022 WL 20690152, at *] (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 6201737 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 2023). SO ORDERED. iF Dated: November 7, 2023 wl MO ac, New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge