Murphy v. State
This text of 941 S.W.2d 656 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant, Kevin Murphy, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after he pled guilty to attempted first degree robbery, RSMo § 569.020,1 and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
941 S.W.2d 656, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 241, 1997 WL 63411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-moctapp-1997.