Murphy v. State

941 S.W.2d 656, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 241, 1997 WL 63411
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murphy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 451
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 18, 1997·No. No. 70345·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kevin Murphy, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after he pled guilty to attempted first degree robbery, RSMo § 569.020,1 and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. State, 941 S.W.2d 656, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 241, 1997 WL 63411 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

941 S.W.2d 656 (Murphy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 569.020
Missouri § 569.020
§ 571.015
Missouri § 571.015